There is nothing more disruptive to any movement than a counterweight. In the case of social impact, there is no doubt that if the policies imposed by the Trump administration between 2016 and 2020 are repeated, civil society will awaken, exhausted by social inequalities and rampant environmental degradation, driven by clearly denialist policies.
Let’s recall the most relevant events of that period:
1. Social and political polarization
- Increased political division: His combative style and direct rhetoric exacerbated divisions between ideological, racial, and social groups in the United States.
- Resurgence of extremist movements: Nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric strengthened white supremacist groups and populist movements.
2. Debate on human rights
- Immigration policies: Measures such as the travel ban on certain Muslim-majority countries and the family separation policy at the border drew criticism for human rights violations.
- Impact on immigrant communities: Anti-immigrant policies and rhetoric increased anxiety and fear within these communities.
3. Impact on science and climate change
- Climate change denial: Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement and rolled back environmental regulations, raising concerns in communities already affected by climate change.
- Cuts to science and education: His administration limited funding for scientific research and educational programs focused on diversity and equity.
4. Economy and social inequality
- Focus on tax cuts: Fiscal policies primarily benefited large corporations and the wealthy, exacerbating economic inequality.
- Impact on vulnerable workers: While employment figures appeared positive, many low-income communities and minorities did not experience significant improvements.
A new Trump administration is expected to mark a period of social transformation in the United States, intensifying internal tensions but also sparking mobilizations in response to his policies. This was already seen in his previous term with the Women’s March (in defense of women’s rights), Black Lives Matter (which gained strength in response to his racial rhetoric and police violence), and climate movements that sought to counteract setbacks in environmental policies.
The future impact of his new term remains a subject of debate regarding the balance between freedom of speech, human rights, and the role of leaders in social cohesion. That is why, now more than ever, Europe must continue to lead the purpose-driven economy worldwide, and Spain must demonstrate that it is possible to have successful businesses while respecting social rights and environmental impact.